24x15.5cm Classic Cyanotype from TruNeg Negative

Exhibition quality carbon print with excellent deep shadow detail and subtle highlights

Copy of 28 x 18.1 cm Carbon Print with Oxide Black pigment made with a TruNeg Negative

The Authentic Digital Negative and why the Inverted Image Fails

Before going into why the editing program’s negative doesn’t work, a true digital negative needs to be defined.

By convention, the standard photographic negative, whether analog or digital, records a brightness range of eight stops, that is, the brightness doubles eight times, once for each stop, from the darkest to the brightest recorded tones. 

The silver gelatin negative, for the most part, increases in density by regular amounts for each stop increase in the subject brightness.

In the 16-bit positive digital image, RGB 17 is considered to be the first discernible tone from black and pixel values increase from 16 to 255 by a factor of 1.41 for each stop change in exposure.

A table showing stops from 0 to 8, with corresponding position pixel values and a constant factor of 1.41 for each stop.

If the positive image increases by a factor of 1.41 for each stop, then for a negative to be an exact inversion of the positive image, it has to decrease from 255 to 16 by a factor of 1.41 for each stop.

A table showing negative pixel values and factors for different pixel shifts from 0 to +8.

However, the negative range that prints the eight stop subject range varies across printers and processes, and the factor will change accordingly.

A true digital negative is a negative in which the pixel values decrease by a constant factor for each stop increase in exposure.

The True Digital Negative

Why the Inverted Negative Fails

Incorrectly inverted negative showing “underexposed” shadows and truncated highlights

The traditional inverted negative fails because the photo editing programs invert the image by subtracting the positive pixel value from 255.

Table displaying stops 0 to 8, negative pixel values, and factors with corresponding negative pixel values, but factor for stop 8 is missing.

This creates a negative with very small and uneven factors in the shadows and midtone stops, and large jumps in the highlights. This explains the faint, low-contrast shadows and midtones and the excessive contrast in the highlights of inverted negatives.

Line graph comparing correct negative and arithmetic negative pixel values against subject brightness in stops, with negative pixel values decreasing as brightness increases.

Plotting the inverted negative in blue against the correct negative in yellow shows the extent of the problem

The figure above also shows the constantly changing proportion between the positive exposure stops and negative pixel values. For example, in the correct negative, the range between stops one and two is 52 RGB, but the range between six and seven is 9 RGB, making it difficult to calculate the intermediate negative values.

The Authentic Photographic Digital Negative

A graph displaying the relationship between negative and positive prints in printing technology. It has a black background with yellow trend line, labeled axes, and annotations indicating print types and gamma correction.

If the logarithms of the stop inputs are plotted against the logarithms of the negative, the graph becomes a straight line, indicating an inverse proportion between the positive and negative logarithms.

Therefore, if the parameters of the negative range are known,
the negative value B of any positive pixel A can be calculated
by the laws of inverse proportion.

Logarithmically inverted negative showing the full range of shadow and highlight tones